A reduction in systemic risk is one great benefit of global financial reform; another is the increasing volume of data made available to market participants and observers.  Even still, finding and deciphering that public data is often easier said then done.  FCM interactions with institutional clients in the cleared swaps market is a perfect example.  While the National Futures Association (NFA) provides frequently updated data on cleared swaps customer collateral value held in segregation accounts per FCM, digging that data out of their web tool is a little harder than it probably should be.  Nevertheless, we've done the dirty work and the results as of September 30, 2014 are listed below.

A few things to keep in mind when using customer collateral numbers as a proxy for market share.  First, the client mix of the given FCM plays a big part in the amount of initial margin they are holding.  A long list of clients with directional bets (or hedges) on interest rate moves will result in a much higher initial margin requirement than an FCM whose clients are more diverse.  A hedge fund client who trades heavily but maintains a duration near zero will not have to post very much initial margin, for example.

That leads us to the second point - duration.  Longer dated swaps have much higher initial margin requirements than shorter duration swaps.  So a client book big on 30 year US dollar swaps would generate a much higher collateral value held in segregation than a portfolio full of 2 year swaps.  That said, the notional size of the former will generally be smaller than the notional size of the latter which in some cases could equalize the margin requirement gap - which brings us to the third point.

While FCMs are making some of their money via a running IM charge, the majority of a swap FCMs revenue comes in the form of ticket charges.  This means its more important from a profitability standpoint to have high turn-over clients as opposed to clients trading a limited number of very large tickets.  The data as listed below does not give us insight into the total number of tickets processed (and hence commission revenue collected) from clearing those trades.

With all of that said, we will leave you with the NFA's data and leave you to draw your own conclusions.

FCM

Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral Value Required to be Held in Segregation

Credit Suisse

$8,353,094,720

Barclays

$6,091,781,899

Citi

$5,628,445,001

Morgan Stanley

$5,113,426,671

J.P.Morgan

$4,133,206,554

Goldman Sachs

$2,486,463,223

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

$2,212,071,651

Deutsche Bank

$1,862,094,006

Wells Fargo

$1,649,938,046

UBS

$879,655,099

HSBC

$618,268,840

State Street

$487,896,651

BNP Paribas

$447,597,920

RBS

$25,323,805

Nomura Securities

$19,896,993

Source: National Futures Association; data as of September 30, 2014

Author

About Kevin McPartland

Kevin McPartland is the head of market structure and technology research at Greenwich Associates. He has nearly 20 years of capital markets industry experience with deep expertise in market structure, regulation and technology impacting the fixed-... view more

Stay in Touch!